Version 1.1.5? Updates?

cinq · Post by **cinq** » Sun May 21, 2006 3:42 am

Just downloaded the latest version of the SManager....v1.1.5

Can someone charm in what are the changes?

Silverbeast · Post by **Silverbeast** » Sun May 21, 2006 10:37 pm

F1 is your friend :)

V1.1.5 (19 May 2006)
? Added S300J support.

? Allow KManager and SManager to connect to ECUs simultaneously

? Improved importing s200 calibrations using a 5 bar MAP

? Improved data integrity when downloading from the ECU which was uploaded with an old SManager version

cinq · Post by **cinq** » Tue May 23, 2006 10:02 am

Silverbeast wrote:F1 is your friend :)

V1.1.5 (19 May 2006)
? Added S300J support.

? Allow KManager and SManager to connect to ECUs simultaneously

? Improved importing s200 calibrations using a 5 bar MAP

? Improved data integrity when downloading from the ECU which was uploaded with an old SManager version

F1 as in F1 for "Low Speed Ignition"?

Thanks for the info.

TurboLS · Post by **TurboLS** » Fri May 26, 2006 5:56 am

Does this version export all the data in the columns of the CSV file?? If so, I can finally get some statistical models going ;)

Silverbeast · Post by **Silverbeast** » Fri May 26, 2006 1:52 pm

I just exported to a .csv

try it :)

TurboLS · Post by **TurboLS** » Fri May 26, 2006 1:53 pm

Well, before, only the first 5 columns had actual data from a datalog session. I had heard rumors that this new version would fill in all of the columns. I'll find out tonight either way, but the anticipation is killer!

alblude · Post by **alblude** » Sat May 27, 2006 2:59 am

It does fill on all the columns, but at least the VSS column seems wrong in my case. It shows I did 143 in 3rd gear at 7K... DAMN I'M FAST!!!! the actual sensor screen says 89mph. Also would be nice if we got AF values instead of the Lambda values, or maybe this should reflect the settings, that way if someone likes lambda vs. AF they can get that...

just my $.02

TurboLS · Post by **TurboLS** » Sat May 27, 2006 3:29 am

the VSS displays in kph FYI. I had the same epiphany of my speed. Also, when I get lambda and the ect and iat in celsius, I just convert everything in excel and generate curves that way. You can open up CSV's directly in excel.

alblude · Post by **alblude** » Sat May 27, 2006 12:43 pm

I guess I shoulda said DAMN I'M STUPID!!! LMFAO... I apparently have been in this country for too damn long. Do you by any chance have the conversion values/formulas for all this stuff? I don't believe in reinventing the wheel...

Too_smooth · Post by **Too_smooth** » Sat May 27, 2006 6:10 pm

All you'll have to do is go under:

1. Options
2. Sensors

Choose the sensor you want to look at and change the unit there.

alblude · Post by **alblude** » Sat May 27, 2006 11:24 pm

Too_smooth wrote:All you'll have to do is go under:

1. Options
2. Sensors

Choose the sensor you want to look at and change the unit there.

I was actually talking about the data exported into .csv.

TurboLS · Post by **TurboLS** » Sun May 28, 2006 12:19 am

well, for lambda, 14.7 A/F = 1 lambda and for celsius to faranheit, just google it cuz i'm lazy. it's something like F = C*(9/5)+32 or something

alblude · Post by **alblude** » Sun May 28, 2006 5:26 pm

actually I found this on the PLXDevices forum

A/F=2*V+10 where V is the ELD voltage value, but the interesting thing is that when Lambda is 1 the ELD voltage could be anywhere between 2.58 and 2.66. Seems that the ELD voltage that will produce 14.7 based on the above formula is 2.35V.

Does anyone have any comments about this?

TurboLS · Post by **TurboLS** » Sun May 28, 2006 6:18 pm

Yeha, it's an interesting dilemma because the CSV logs both ELD and Lambda. Lambda is defined by ELD and I believe that each A/F value stored (in the table that is) is an average of four values in the same load/rpm range. As for the tolerance of the ELD voltage for a given lambda value, the PLX guys will have to share some input on that one.

alblude · Post by **alblude** » Sun May 28, 2006 9:34 pm

You're right, the question should be for the PLX folks. If I derive the AF from the ELD values the AF curve looks a bit more similar with the curve from my last dyno tune. the .15V of difference in the formula is pretty considerable and I might not be running as rich as I thought I was....