Page 1 of 1
IAT / ECT fuel compensation tables
Posted: Wed Jun 09, 2010 11:47 am
by Gernby
I tried looking in the help documentation, but couldn't find the answer to this question. What does "low flow", "medium flow", and "high flow" really mean in the IAT compensation tables? Will someone please identify what actual MAP pressure each would be?
For Coolant temp compensations, there is only "Low" and "High", but I'm not sure if this stands for low and high FLOW, or low and high CAM. If this is for FLOW, does low and high equate to the same MAP pressures as for IAT compensation?
Re: IAT / ECT fuel compensation tables
Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2010 10:30 am
by soxfan143
Gernby wrote:I tried looking in the help documentation, but couldn't find the answer to this question. What does "low flow", "medium flow", and "high flow" really mean in the IAT compensation tables? Will someone please identify what actual MAP pressure each would be?
For Coolant temp compensations, there is only "Low" and "High", but I'm not sure if this stands for low and high FLOW, or low and high CAM. If this is for FLOW, does low and high equate to the same MAP pressures as for IAT compensation?
The low medium and high flow are load based. I would also like to know where the cutoff is for each.
The ECT is load based as well and I think it says <40kpa for the low flow and >40kpa high flow. I can't remember exactly. Wait, is that for IAT ignition or fuel for the values I just listed? lol...
Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2010 10:48 am
by Gernby
Ah ... The tables for IAT ignition compensation do say 40 kPA is the divider. Can we assume that is the divider for all compensation tables?
Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2010 10:57 am
by soxfan143
Gernby wrote:Ah ... The tables for IAT ignition compensation do say 40 kPA is the divider. Can we assume that is the divider for all compensation tables?
Not sure yet. I'm trying to find out. I would assume that but you know what happens when you assume something. lol