Bug (?): CAM Angle Table (Lo/Hi) Upload != Download
-
freezingcoffee
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2011 1:15 am
Re: Bug (?): CAM Angle Table (Lo/Hi) Upload != Download
I'm running a 2001 Honda s2000. Nothing has changed on my vehicle in the past 8 months.
Re: Bug (?): CAM Angle Table (Lo/Hi) Upload != Download
@Hondata: Did you get a chance to test the AFCMD scenario on a PRC ECU?
How about the TPS scaling issue? Some others have the same issue. (I know it is strange, as I expect that part of software would change).
Thanks.
How about the TPS scaling issue? Some others have the same issue. (I know it is strange, as I expect that part of software would change).
Thanks.
Re: Bug (?): CAM Angle Table (Lo/Hi) Upload != Download
The PRC ECU runs exactly the same code as the PRB.
Try this with the TPS, reset the scaling and then see what the TPS minimum is. If it is below 0, then manually -1, -2, etc and upload until you get the TPS to read 0%. If you get below -5% then your TPS is too far out to compensate, and needs adjustment.
The AFCMD normally jumps around all over the place - you would have to ask Honda why. Going to around 12.5 is normal under high load, but it also will go rich briefly after overrun cutoff and when leaving idle.
Try this with the TPS, reset the scaling and then see what the TPS minimum is. If it is below 0, then manually -1, -2, etc and upload until you get the TPS to read 0%. If you get below -5% then your TPS is too far out to compensate, and needs adjustment.
The AFCMD normally jumps around all over the place - you would have to ask Honda why. Going to around 12.5 is normal under high load, but it also will go rich briefly after overrun cutoff and when leaving idle.
Hondata
Re: Bug (?): CAM Angle Table (Lo/Hi) Upload != Download
Hondata: Could you upload a datalog (1.5.1.0) for me to compare please?
A few minutes of road driving is good enough (after car has warmed up). I really want to know if my KPro is behaving the right way.
Thanks.
A few minutes of road driving is good enough (after car has warmed up). I really want to know if my KPro is behaving the right way.
Thanks.
Re: Bug (?): CAM Angle Table (Lo/Hi) Upload != Download
Sample datalog from a cold start.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Hondata
Re: Bug (?): CAM Angle Table (Lo/Hi) Upload != Download
Thanks Hondata.
Would you have a sample datalog from v1.5.1.0? (The one above is from v1.3.1.0).
Would you have a sample datalog from v1.5.1.0? (The one above is from v1.3.1.0).
Re: Bug (?): CAM Angle Table (Lo/Hi) Upload != Download
In version 1.4.1 my TPS was 0% In ver. 1.5.1 my TPS is already -1% I try to calibrate it to reach 0%, but TPS returns to -1% It's normally?Hondata wrote:The PRC ECU runs exactly the same code as the PRB.
Try this with the TPS, reset the scaling and then see what the TPS minimum is. If it is below 0, then manually -1, -2, etc and upload until you get the TPS to read 0%. If you get below -5% then your TPS is too far out to compensate, and needs adjustment.

Yes I noticed this. And this is still problem for me.The AFCMD normally jumps around all over the place - you would have to ask Honda why. Going to around 12.5 is normal under high load, but it also will go rich briefly after overrun cutoff and when leaving idle.

Cr-v RD8+K24A2turbo+Kpro V4 prb+NPR3/6Speed+ТС+ HFS4 v3.2.
DynoWheel = 472kW / 589 N.m
HRX One Mile Challenge = Max Speed 282km
Known as Sniper
DynoWheel = 472kW / 589 N.m
HRX One Mile Challenge = Max Speed 282km
Known as Sniper
Re: Bug (?): CAM Angle Table (Lo/Hi) Upload != Download
If your TPS is reading negative, then you need to decrease the minimum %.
The AFCMD looks normal. If goes rich at higher rpm for catalyst protection.
The AFCMD looks normal. If goes rich at higher rpm for catalyst protection.
Hondata