TPS Scale (min) and Overrun Fuel Cut-Off (TPS)

s300 and SManager software questions & answers
Post Reply
Johnny_9
Posts: 312
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 5:12 am

TPS Scale (min) and Overrun Fuel Cut-Off (TPS)

Post by Johnny_9 »

My throttle closed reading is 0.49v. This gives a TPS (min) scalar -0.29% (negative). Is this OK or is it better to get it adjusted to 0.51v (marginally positive)?. This has got me thinking....please share your experience/know-how

Image

Does Overrun Fuel Cut-off (TPS) need a positive (+ve) percentage like 0.1% or will it function OK when if -1.0% is input


The help file says that Scalar TPS (min) should be read with the engine off.
Mine is 1.45% (0.41v)

Image


With the Engine idling is -0.29% (0.49v) - Is the difference versus the TPS scale min -1.45% (0.41v) of normal? Is Throttle cable too loose or too tight, i cant figure it out....please comment.
Luke
Posts: 249
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2009 10:24 am
Location: Dorsten/Germany

Post by Luke »

the scaling is, like the name says, a scaling :D

that means, that the value you get is given as a reference.

like so: -1.45% reading = 0% value
76.15% reading = 100% value in program

everything in between is so something between 0% and 100%.

if you check the reading of TPS after scaling, you will see, that now it is without throttle pushed 0% and at WOT it is 100%

best regards Lukas
Tsuchinoko
Posts: 140
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 4:38 am

Post by Tsuchinoko »

I think your TPS is not okay.
Those who know don't tell, and those who tell don't know.
Johnny_9
Posts: 312
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 5:12 am

Explain

Post by Johnny_9 »

Please explain.
Tsuchinoko
Posts: 140
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 4:38 am

Post by Tsuchinoko »

Replace your TPS.
Those who know don't tell, and those who tell don't know.
Post Reply