IAT / ECT fuel compensation tables

FlashPro Manager software
Post Reply
Gernby
Posts: 307
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2009 2:53 pm

IAT / ECT fuel compensation tables

Post by Gernby »

I tried looking in the help documentation, but couldn't find the answer to this question. What does "low flow", "medium flow", and "high flow" really mean in the IAT compensation tables? Will someone please identify what actual MAP pressure each would be?

For Coolant temp compensations, there is only "Low" and "High", but I'm not sure if this stands for low and high FLOW, or low and high CAM. If this is for FLOW, does low and high equate to the same MAP pressures as for IAT compensation?
'06 NFR S2000
soxfan143
Posts: 216
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 5:09 pm
Location: lynnfield MA

Re: IAT / ECT fuel compensation tables

Post by soxfan143 »

Gernby wrote:I tried looking in the help documentation, but couldn't find the answer to this question. What does "low flow", "medium flow", and "high flow" really mean in the IAT compensation tables? Will someone please identify what actual MAP pressure each would be?

For Coolant temp compensations, there is only "Low" and "High", but I'm not sure if this stands for low and high FLOW, or low and high CAM. If this is for FLOW, does low and high equate to the same MAP pressures as for IAT compensation?
The low medium and high flow are load based. I would also like to know where the cutoff is for each.

The ECT is load based as well and I think it says <40kpa for the low flow and >40kpa high flow. I can't remember exactly. Wait, is that for IAT ignition or fuel for the values I just listed? lol...
Gernby
Posts: 307
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2009 2:53 pm

Post by Gernby »

Ah ... The tables for IAT ignition compensation do say 40 kPA is the divider. Can we assume that is the divider for all compensation tables?
'06 NFR S2000
soxfan143
Posts: 216
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 5:09 pm
Location: lynnfield MA

Post by soxfan143 »

Gernby wrote:Ah ... The tables for IAT ignition compensation do say 40 kPA is the divider. Can we assume that is the divider for all compensation tables?
Not sure yet. I'm trying to find out. I would assume that but you know what happens when you assume something. lol
Post Reply