A/F Ratio Spike to 32

cranny · Post by **cranny** » Mon Jan 12, 2009 9:36 am

if your spinning you dont get a very accurate datalog. im sure fonz will tell you the same thing. might have to wait till its clear again.

fonz600 · Post by **fonz600** » Mon Jan 12, 2009 11:53 am

yeah needs to be without spinning. That run was quite a bit leaner than your last but noticed your IAT temps were a lot colder.

Were do you live as your IAT temps are mega cold. Might need to tweak temp compensation to suit your climate.

da_gawd · Post by **da_gawd** » Mon Jan 12, 2009 5:11 pm

fonz600 wrote:yeah needs to be without spinning. That run was quite a bit leaner than your last but noticed your IAT temps were a lot colder.

Were do you live as your IAT temps are mega cold. Might need to tweak temp compensation to suit your climate.

I live in Canada and we've been having snowstorm after snowstorm. It might be a while before I can do another run. Its going to be -40 celcius tomorrow. Would temperature compensation work? Would I need a map for the winter and one for the summer? In the summer it can get as hot as 35 celcius.

cranny · Post by **cranny** » Mon Jan 12, 2009 9:49 pm

i live in same conditions and in canada. right now outside its -10 celcius , i dont know exactly what that is in farenheit but , its cold , lol.

Zigg · Post by **Zigg** » Tue Jan 13, 2009 11:21 pm

(*Cx1.8)+32 = *F

14 - Sounds about right.

Looking forward to Thursday with a low of -19C!!!!

fonz600 · Post by **fonz600** » Wed Jan 14, 2009 2:36 am

da_gawd wrote:
fonz600 wrote:yeah needs to be without spinning. That run was quite a bit leaner than your last but noticed your IAT temps were a lot colder.

Were do you live as your IAT temps are mega cold. Might need to tweak temp compensation to suit your climate.
I live in Canada and we've been having snowstorm after snowstorm. It might be a while before I can do another run. Its going to be -40 celcius tomorrow. Would temperature compensation work? Would I need a map for the winter and one for the summer? In the summer it can get as hot as 35 celcius.

Nah you should only need 1 map and temp compensation should compensate, pardon the pun, for the temp but keep an eye on your logs is always a good idea. Just run with the map before the last one as slightly richer on that one and will help with the colder weather till we get the temp compensation sorted.

da_gawd · Post by **da_gawd** » Mon Jan 26, 2009 7:55 pm

fonz600 wrote:
da_gawd wrote:
fonz600 wrote:yeah needs to be without spinning. That run was quite a bit leaner than your last but noticed your IAT temps were a lot colder.

Were do you live as your IAT temps are mega cold. Might need to tweak temp compensation to suit your climate.
I live in Canada and we've been having snowstorm after snowstorm. It might be a while before I can do another run. Its going to be -40 celcius tomorrow. Would temperature compensation work? Would I need a map for the winter and one for the summer? In the summer it can get as hot as 35 celcius.
Nah you should only need 1 map and temp compensation should compensate, pardon the pun, for the temp but keep an eye on your logs is always a good idea. Just run with the map before the last one as slightly richer on that one and will help with the colder weather till we get the temp compensation sorted.

Hey Fonz, I was finally able to do a run. Its still cold but i did it anyway since the roads were fairly dry . I've posted it.

Thanks.

fonz600 · Post by **fonz600** » Tue Jan 27, 2009 1:06 pm

OK mate,

I'll take a look and get back to you.

fonz600 · Post by **fonz600** » Wed Jan 28, 2009 7:10 pm

What map was it you ran that datalog for?

da_gawd · Post by **da_gawd** » Wed Jan 28, 2009 8:39 pm

fonz600 wrote:What map was it you ran that datalog for?

i ran the map from Jan 1. You had modified on january 8 but I went back to this one because the car was running rich at WOT, probably due to the cold temperatures.

i've also attached the one from january 8.

fonz600 · Post by **fonz600** » Thu Jan 29, 2009 8:42 am

Thats fine mate. I was just confused as opened the last map I supplied and was surprised to see it was still rich.
Can you try a run with the 8/1 map as think most of the changes are already done on that map.

da_gawd · Post by **da_gawd** » Fri Jan 30, 2009 4:11 am

fonz600 wrote:Thats fine mate. I was just confused as opened the last map I supplied and was surprised to see it was still rich.
Can you try a run with the 8/1 map as think most of the changes are already done on that map.

Okay, I'll do a run with the 8/1 map as soon as it stops snowing and the roads are dry.

da_gawd · Post by **da_gawd** » Sun Feb 01, 2009 2:44 pm

fonz600 wrote:Thats fine mate. I was just confused as opened the last map I supplied and was surprised to see it was still rich.
Can you try a run with the 8/1 map as think most of the changes are already done on that map.

Here is a dyno run using the map from Jan 8.

fonz600 · Post by **fonz600** » Mon Feb 02, 2009 11:23 am

Starting to look better now mate. Try this.

da_gawd · Post by **da_gawd** » Mon Feb 02, 2009 7:23 pm

fonz600 wrote:Starting to look better now mate. Try this.

Here is a datalog using the new map.