Search found 10 matches
- Fri May 14, 2004 3:27 pm
- Forum: s100/s200
- Topic: 304stock.bin
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2682
- Sun May 09, 2004 8:12 pm
- Forum: s100/s200
- Topic: 304stock.bin
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2682
- Sat May 08, 2004 8:48 pm
- Forum: s100/s200
- Topic: 304stock.bin
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2682
304stock.bin
Will writing the 304stock.bin to a chip make my p28 work just like a stock ECU? Or do I need to "dechip" my ECU if I want it to work like a stock one? And is that the right .bin for a 92-95 civic?
- Sun Apr 25, 2004 6:33 am
- Forum: s100/s200
- Topic: Idle and start problem when warm outside
- Replies: 7
- Views: 5257
Re: Idle and start problem when warm outside
Have you tried lowering your cranking fuel adjustment? 0.413 would be a good starting point.
- Sun Aug 24, 2003 10:44 am
- Forum: Non-Hondata
- Topic: ecu idle issue
- Replies: 6
- Views: 5362
- Sun Aug 24, 2003 5:58 am
- Forum: s100/s200
- Topic: Need help with Hondata misfire.
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2058
- Thu Aug 21, 2003 6:05 pm
- Forum: s100/s200
- Topic: Need help with Hondata misfire.
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2058
Need help with Hondata misfire.
I have an intermittent missfire with my d16z6 with Greddy turbo. Sometimes it's minor, sometimes it's pretty bad. Here's a .rec graph of a bad one. Any ideas?

- Tue Aug 12, 2003 4:00 am
- Forum: s100/s200
- Topic: 3rd Bad Hondata Chipped P28 ECU??????
- Replies: 7
- Views: 7017
Re: 3rd Bad Hondata Chipped P28 ECU??????
Is it possible you have the MAP and IAT connectors switched?brockwelch wrote:The only code that the ECU will throw is for the IAT sensor. Even with the map sensor unplugged it will not throw a code for the map sensor.
- Fri Jul 04, 2003 8:45 am
- Forum: s100/s200
- Topic: Quick fuel table edit???
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2723
- Fri Jul 04, 2003 5:11 am
- Forum: s100/s200
- Topic: Quick fuel table edit???
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2723
Quick fuel table edit???
I have my fuel tables set so that it runs right at 12.2:1 under boost. If I wanted it to run about 12.5:1, could I adjust that portion of the fuel table by 2.5% and be close. (12.2 + 2.5% = 12.5) Or is there a flaw in my math?